One of the most popular articles on
this website is, do ice baths work?
However, as time goes by, research
updates and more information surmounts.
A recent study looked at all the
data on ice baths, take a look:
"Seventeen small trials were
included, involving a total of 366 participants. Study quality was low. The
temperature, duration and frequency of cold-water immersion varied between the
different trials as did the exercises and settings. The majority of studies
failed to report active surveillance of pre-defined adverse events.Fourteen
studies compared cold-water immersion with passive intervention. Pooled results
for muscle soreness showed statistically significant effects in favour of
cold-water immersion after exercise at 24 hour (standardised mean difference
(SMD) -0.55, 95% CI -0.84 to -0.27; 10 trials), 48 hour (SMD -0.66, 95% CI
-0.97 to -0.35; 8 trials), 72 hour (SMD -0.93; 95% CI -1.36 to -0.51; 4 trials)
and 96 hour (SMD -0.58; 95% CI -1.00 to -0.16; 5 trials) follow-ups. These
results were heterogeneous. Exploratory subgroup analyses showed that studies
using cross-over designs or running based exercises showed significantly larger
effects in favour of cold-water immersion. Pooled results from two studies
found cold-water immersion groups had significantly lower ratings of fatigue
(MD -1.70; 95% CI -2.49 to -0.90; 10 units scale, best to worst), and
potentially improved ratings of physical recovery (MD 0.97; 95% CI -0.10 to
2.05; 10 units scale, worst to best) immediately after the end of cold-water
immersion.Five studies compared cold-water with contrast immersion. Pooled data
for pain showed no evidence of differences between the two groups at four
follow-up times (immediately, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment). Similar
findings for pooled analyses at 24, 48 and 72 hour follow-ups applied to the
four studies comparing cold-water with warm-water immersion. Single trials only
compared cold-water immersion with respectively active recovery, compression
and a second dose of cold-water immersion at 24 hours."
This study concluded:
"There was some evidence that
cold-water immersion reduces delayed onset muscle soreness after exercise
compared with passive interventions involving rest or no intervention. There
was insufficient evidence to conclude on other outcomes or for other
comparisons. The majority of trials did not undertake active surveillance of
pre-defined adverse events. High quality, well reported research in this area
is required."
Conclusion
Clear evidence for ice baths is
still absent, however it seems clear cold water immersion improves muscle
soreness. However, this is insufficient evidence showing cold water immersion
is better than active recovery or active recovery and cold water immersion is
superior than only active recovery. Despite more research, the question remains
unclear. Do ice baths work? What do you think?
References
- Bleakley C, McDonough S, Gardner E, Baxter GD, Hopkins
JT, Davison GW. Cold-water immersion (cryotherapy) for preventing and
treating muscle soreness after exercise. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012
Feb 15;2:CD008262.
By G. John Mullen founder of the Center
of Optimal Restoration, head strength coach at Santa Clara Swim
Club, and creator the Swimmer's Shoulder System.
Interesting stuff. Definitely an area ruled more by hunch than evidence.
ReplyDeleteHow tight is the link between soreness and performance? Presumably one can be sore yet still near full capacity (and lack of soreness isn't an indication of recovery)?
Great point, I am not familiar with any such research (at least on the top of my head)
ReplyDelete