Sprint running performance is an important aspect of many sports. Various studies have studied the relationship between strength and sprinting performance and it appears maximal free weight squat strength and sprint performance are correlated in well-trained individuals.
This study looked to compare maximal back squat strength and 5-, 10-, and 20-m sprint performances and their relationships in well-trained athletes and recreationally trained individuals.
What was done
Twenty-four, professional, rugby league players and twenty recreationally trained individuals performed maximal squat strength and sprint performances on separate days. On the sprint day, participants performed three 20-m sprints, where 5, 10, and 20 m times were assessed.
There was not significantly significant different between the two groups in the 5-meter sprint, however there was statistically significant different times in the 10- and 20-meter times.
Statistically significant correlations were found between 5-m sprint times in both groups, however, in the 10- and 20- meter distances, only the recreational group had significant correlations with relative strength.
The lack of difference between times in the 5-meter run is potentially due to the innate properties involved in this short a distance. In the longer runs, the lack of correlation with relative strength in the well-trained group is potentially due to the stretch-shortening cycle, therefore reducing the relationship between maximal strength and sprint performance over longer distances.
The correlation between maximal strength and swimming already lacks evidence. If running does not have a direct correlation with squat strength, then it is unlikely swimming has any correlation. Also, the only correlation was found in the 5-meter distance, a race much shorter than any swimming distance.
This study also did not look at elite athletes, making the connection between these participants and elite swimmers likely minimally. However, it supports the notion that maximal squat strength does not appear to be relative for running and likely swimming.
Swimming Science Research Review
This is a piece of the July Swimming Science Research Review. Read Swimming Science Research Review September 2012 for a complete list of the articles reviewed.
Sign-up here to receive this month’s edition and all future publications for only $10/month. Each edition covers articles ranging from biomechaincs, physiology, rehabilitation, genetic, and much more! These reviews explain the latest sports science research in straightforward language.
This will help you apply knowledge in the review to the pool deck, separating yourself from your peers!
And don’t worry, there’s no fixed commitment period, so if you don’t want to continue receiving the monthly publication, you can just cancel your payment whenever you want.