Take Home Points on Determinants of Masters Swimming Performance
Dr. Barbosa examined performance changes throughout the swimming lifespan. In this post, we’ll complement that topic focusing on the masters swimming literature. Note, Dr. Barbosa recently published a study on the role of biomechanics in masters swimmers.
5 Factors Influencing Masters Swimming Performance
1. Physical Qualities
3. Position in Age-Group
4. Training Style
High volume versus high intensity is an ongoing debate, with modern research suggesting the value of high-intensity training. As they note, some studies have suggested that overall training intensity may be more important than training volume for improving masters swimming performance. However, these studies were focused on very young subjects and/or the difference between high-volume and high-intensity training was blurred.
The most recent study (Pugliese 2015) applied a blocked periodization model to a group of masters swimmers. Now, masters swimming often lacks formal periodization, with many swimmers content to follow the same week-to-week routine throughout the calendar year. That’s not a critique of masters coaching, it is simply a fact of the culture, which is much different than the age group world. Periodization in masters swimming is often built more around kids’ school calendars, vacations, and triathlon season than optimizing master swimming performance.
In the study, subjects trained six weeks with low intensity, high volume training, followed by six weeks reduced volume with high-intensity training. After the first block significant improvements were noted in O2 peak, 400m time trial performance, and anaerobic threshold. After the second six week block, the speed at anaerobic threshold and 100m time trial masters swimming performance improved, but other performance variables did not.
What does this study contribute? First, as authors note, a period of reduced volume and higher intensity can enhance sprint performance after a high volume base period. Likewise, it can sustain fitness for middle distance events after a lower intensity/higher volume base period. Generally, this research is consistent with the seminal work by Neufer (1987) and Costill (1991) in this area.
5. Social Life
More practically, this is also a reminder to masters swimmers that even if commitments outside the pool force you away from your normal training regime, a low volume-high intensity regime can maintain your fitness so that you can resume quality training at a similar level in the future.
One weakness in this study is a lack of a control group. Yes, swimmers improved in the second condition (lower volume, higher intensity), but might they have also improved had they stayed on the same training program as the first six weeks? We simply don’t know that answer. Further, it is possible that middle and long distance master swimming performance would have been improved in the low volume-high intensity condition with a shorter taper period.
Conclusion on Determinants of Masters Swimming Performance
Overall, this research confirms what most would intuitively suspect. Most important is that we have more data on periodization in a masters population, which is lacking the research depth of age group swimming. Though cultural factors often make periodization difficult to apply in a masters setting, know that manipulating the schedule is one way to achieve gains in this setting.
- Pugliese L, Porcelli S, Bonato M, Pavei G, La Torre A, Maggioni MA, Bellistri G, Marzorati M. Effects of Manipulating Volume and Intensity Training in Masters Swimmers. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015 Feb 24. [Epub ahead of print]
- Neufer PD, Costill DL, Fielding RA, Flynn MG, Kirwan JP. Effect of reduced training on muscular strength and endurance in competitive swimmers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987 Oct;19(5):486-90.
- Costill DL, Thomas R, Robergs RA, Pascoe D, Lambert C, Barr S, Fink WJ. Adaptations to swimming training: influence of training volume. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Mar;23(3):371-7.
- Fairbrother JT. Prediction of 1500-m freestyle swimming times for older masters all-American swimmers. Exp Aging Res. 2007 Oct-Dec;33(4):461-71.
- Rubin RT, Lin S, Curtis A, Auerbach D, Win C. Declines in swimming performance with age: a longitudinal study of Masters swimming champions. Open Access J Sports Med. 2013 Mar 12;4:63-70. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S37718. eCollection 2013.
- Zampagni ML, Casino D, Benelli P, Visani A, Marcacci M, De Vito G. Anthropometric and strength variables to predict freestyle performance times in elite master swimmers. J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jul;22(4):1298-307. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31816a597b.
- Medic N, Young BW, Medic D. Participation-related relative age effects in Masters swimming: a 6-year retrospective longitudinal analysis. J Sports Sci. 2011 Jan;29(1):29-36. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.520726.
- Fairbrother JT. Age-related changes in top-ten men’s U.S. Masters 50-m freestyle swim times as a function of finishing place. Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Dec;105(3 Pt 2):1289-93.
Written by Allan Phillips is a certified strength and conditioning specialist (CSCS) and owner of Pike Athletics. He is also an ASCA Level II coach and USA Triathlon coach.