Effects of manipulating volume and intensity training in masters swimmers.

Dr. GJohn Mullen Dr. Erin Cameron, Research Abstract, Training 2 Comments


Recently, some studies have suggested that overall training intensity may be more important than training volume for improving swimming performance. However, those studies focused on very young subjects, and/or the difference between high-volume and high-intensity training was blurred. The aim of this study was to investigate in masters swimmers the effects of manipulation of training volume and intensity on performance and physiological variables.

A group of 10 male masters swimmers (age 32.3 ± 5.1 y) performed 2 different 6-wk training periods followed by 1 wk of tapering. The first period was characterized by high training volume performed at low intensity (HvLi), whereas the second period was characterized by low training volume performed at high intensity (LvHi). Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) during incremental arm exercise, individual anaerobic threshold (IAT), and 100-m, 400-m, and 2000-m-freestyle time were evaluated before and at the end of both training periods.

HvLi training significant increased VO2peak (11.9% ± 4.9% [mean change ± 90%CL], P = .002) and performance in the 400-m (-2.8% ± 1.8%, P = .002) and 2000-m (-3.4% ± 2.9%, P = .025), with a likely change in IAT (4.9% ± 4.7%, P > .05). After LvHi training, speed at IAT (12.4% ± 5.3%, P = .004) and 100-m performance (-1.2% ± 0.8%, P = .001) also improved, without any significant changes in VO2peak, 2000-m, and 400-m.

These findings indicate that in masters swimmers an increase of training volume may lead to an improvement of VO2peak and middle- to long-distance performance. However, a subsequent period of LvHi training maintains previous adjustments and positively affects anaerobic threshold and short-distance performance.

Practical Application by Erin Cameron DPT: This study suggests that a period of high volume, low intensity training followed by period of high intensity, low volume training, allows masters swimmers to maintain the positive benefits (improved VO2peak and performance in 400m/2000m events) of high volume training while also improving speed and performance in sprint events. It may be beneficial to structure season programs in this manner to provide variety in training, limit risk of overuse injury and enhance performance across races of various lengths.

1. Pugliese L1, Porcelli S, Bonato M, Pavei G, La Torre A, Maggioni MA, Bellistri G, Marzorati M. Effects of manipulating volume and intensity training in masters swimmers. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015 Oct;10(7):907-12. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2014-0171. Epub 2015 Feb 24.

Comments 2

  1. I think that the subjects are too young for this kind of conclusion for masters. Probably it’ll be very different if the subjects are 40+ Because the recovery time needs to be longer. This is only one idea for the next step.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.